Wednesday, November 2, 2016

A Comment on the Bangsamoro Basic Law (2015 Article)

The following text was adapted from Eugenio of Namayan’s speech delivered to the members of the “Royal Assembly of Senators” of Namayan – a political simulation entity with roughly fifty members concentrated in the Philippines. It is outdated.

To the readers of this text,

I salute you for taking the time to read this short piece. I wrote this short blogpost because I have been concerned recently about the security situation in our country as various insurgencies have escalated in many parts of our country, our fatherland. Long-running communist and Moro insurgencies continue to grapple the security situation of our homeland.

First of all, I would like to say that I am not in any way against the recognition of the plight of the Bangsamoro people. I am indeed sympathetic to those who have been oppressed by brutal and discriminatory regimes. My sympathy to the plight of numerous indigenous groups was sparked after I (as an autodidact) diligently studied the brief history of the pre-Hispanic Philippine kingdoms, sultanates, and states, which effectively made me aware about the sociocultural and religious diversity of the Philippines. I believe this cultural diversity is seemingly threatened by aggressive westernization and cultural assimilation. In short, colonization and the traditions and religion the colonizers brought separated us ethnic Malays. In the south, the culture of the Malays was preserved for three hundred years because Moro and Lumad peoples in Western Mindanao never allowed themselves to be fully subjugated by the colonizers. The Moro people valiantly defended their sovereignty and the stewardship of their homeland. Sadly, the national government only addressed their grievances after bloodshed. The Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), however, failed to live up to its expectations and is still a grim reminder of the nation’s problems. This autonomous region is still plagued with corruption, ignorance, social injustice, private armed groups, terrorism, and political monopoly. These internal problems should be resolved before tinkering around with an upgraded autonomous entity, and I think the current administration is doing its part to do so.

I hereby declare my conditional support to the Bangsamoro Basic Law. I believe it has the potential to bring lasting peace in Mindanao but it should only be passed once the Muslim rebels and mujahedeen show good faith by having their arms decommissioned. This should be overseen directly not only by the Philippine government, which is mistrusted by the Moro rebels, but also by the International Monitoring Team preferably flanked by numerous journalists both local and foreign. Honestly, however, I would rather see the Philippines transform from a unitary state into a federal state just like Malaysia complete with a symbolic monarchy. This is evident in my ongoing literary work, which depicts the rise of an egalitarian Greater Malay Confederation lead by a symbolic Yang di-Pertuan Agong. Unfortunately, effects of colonization would still have a bearing on this theoretical plan. How? Well, majority of the Filipinos claim to be Christian (I’ve seen a lot of nominal nearly faithless Christians who only became Christian because they were “born in it”.) Being Christian is incompatible to the notion of “Masuk Melayu” (entering the “Malay world”) in which one must first become a Muslim before being fully Malay, a condition also stipulated in the 2010 Federal Constitution of Malaysia (Liow, 2010). This apparently has been imbedded in the minds of Malaysians. Like my Malaysian acquaintance who said “I always [hear] and read that a person must be Muslim, fluent in the Malay language and follows Malay customs [before he is considered a Malay].”  To be honest, I feel sad about Masuk Melayu’s religious requirements, since it borders on discrimination based on religion. After the aggressive polities of the United Malays National Organization Party in Malaysia, a country where approximately 60 percent of the population is Muslim, it is common to conflate religious identitya with ethnicity and citizenship (Liow, 2010). Leaving Islam is also considered taboo and the apostate doing so will lose his membership in the “Malay race” (Mueller, 2014). I have heard from my Malaysian acquaintance (and this can be supported with adequate research) that non-Muslims minority groups in Malaysia are sometimes discriminated. The dream of a Greater Malay Confederation is therefore reduced to a mere hypothetical situation.

The reason why I included Malayisation in this discussion is because of the perceived goal of many our Filipino Muslim fellowmen. Some of them feel more religiously and culturally affiliated with Malaysia rather than predominantly Roman Catholic Philippines. Is there a possibility of compromise to water down potential religious conflicts and to simmer down warmongers? I believe so.

I believe secularism, done in a balanced manner, is the best method to preserve religious equality. Right now, the Philippines is far from being secular, since the separation of church and state is still not widely respected. Although I recognize the fact that religion can unite or severely divide, there should be measures taken to safeguard the peaceful coexistence of different belief systems without excessive government meddling. Religious freedom will be useless if it is only allowed when its beliefs fit the current government policies (Trigg, 2012). In the Philippines, government sectors are still Roman Catholic-dominated. The powerful church, if it wants to have a place in government affairs should first pay taxes, a feat they can easily do using the hordes of donations they receive. I am pushing for secularism mainly because I saw the diversity of beliefs in our country and I saw how they are somehow overshadowed by government-sponsored Roman Catholic religious events. I truly believe secularism will pave the way for religious (and non-religious) equality in our homeland. The government shall be neutral but respectful to the traditions of religious and irreligious people alike, as long as it does not border on radical or extremist beliefs. (One man’s freedom should not encroach upon another man’s freedom.)

Lastly, both sides should not let their emotions cloud their reason, let knowledge erase their prejudice. Peace-loving Muslims should also work hard to stop the radicalization of their brothers by evil terrorist groups. I am continuing to hope that the Bangsamoro Basic Law will pave the way for long lasting peace in our united Philippines. Let’s continue to hope for the best for our country. Good day to all!

References:

Liow, J. (2010, February 10). No God But God. Retrieved April 5, 2015, from http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65961/joseph-chinyong-liow/no-god-but-god

Mueller, D. (2014). Islam, Politics and Youth in Malaysia: The Pop-Islamist Reinvention of PAS(pp. 11-12). Routledge.

Trigg, R. (2012). Equality, Freedom, and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Buendia, R. (2004). The GRP‑MILF Peace Talks: Quo Vadis? Southeast Asian Affairs 2004, 205-221.