*adapted
Remember when Philippine Vice President Jejomar Binay brazenly attended on 15 September a general open forum portion of an event titled “Forum on Governance, Transparency and Social Transformation” at the University of the Philippines – Los Baños, a branch campus of the premier University of the Philippines.
Remember when Philippine Vice President Jejomar Binay brazenly attended on 15 September a general open forum portion of an event titled “Forum on Governance, Transparency and Social Transformation” at the University of the Philippines – Los Baños, a branch campus of the premier University of the Philippines.
Due to the fact that Vice
President Binay has been hounded by corruption allegations on all sides, it is
no wonder that the university students (UPLB) pressed Binay in answering their
queries concerning the allegations against him. The open forum, however, became
heated as the questions and subsequent reactions of the students “pinned down”
Binay, the latter forced to utter somehow contradictory statements. The Vice
President was openly jeered by the unsatisfied students as a result.
One example on how Binay got
“roasted” is when he was forced to admit that there are indeed informal
settlers in Makati City, despite brandishing in his propaganda that Makati City
is a “highly developed ‘rich’ city”. When the student pointed out the existence
of informal settlers in Makati, a seemingly surprised Binay initially
challenged the student to point out where the informal settlers are, but in the
end a piqued Binay said that “The informal settlers in Makati are just 3% or 5%”,
a subtle contradiction to his earlier statement that there are no informal settlers in the highly-urbanized
city.
This was just an example of the many heated exchanges he encountered
with socially-aware students of UPLB.
Why would Binay, who cunningly evaded the questioning press and even
turned down a live debate in which corruption issues would be discussed, allow
himself to be “roasted” in a forum turned “inquisition”?
The most probable answer is
simple - he wanted to get taunted and jeered.
I remember an essay by Nicanor
Tiangson titled “Four Values in Filipino Drama and Film”. Basically the essay
not only touched upon the Filipino taste for entertainment but also ultimately
linked it to the socio-cultural phenomenon behind it. One of the principal
values usually encountered in stereotypical Filipino dramas is “Mabuti ang
Inaapi” or “Hurrah for the Underdog”. It is usually the bida (main protagonist)
who is initially maltreated and abused in Filipino dramas, and this ingrained
the value that we should automatically side with the oppressed. There is
nothing wrong with persecution, Tiangson pointed out in the essay, but the idea
that the oppressed are always the
good guys is something we both disapprove.
You see, the students of UPLB
who roasted him in the forum, the upper-middle class users of Twitter who
continuously bash Binay (even ad hominem attacks), and the people who are
celebrating his public roasting are portrayed as “Binay’s oppressors”, the
“kontrabidas” (antagonists) of a seemingly honorable Vice President (or so it
appears). His attendance was not about convincing the UPLB students - it was
about gaining publicity and ultimately, drawing a sharp contrast between people
who oppose him and people who support him. His attendance and subsequent public
"humiliation" at the hands of the perceived middle-class and
upper-middle class lends momentum to the idea of a class struggle. He wanted to
show people how he would be brutalized by university students even after
graciously accepting an invitation to a college forum. He is a Machiavellian
genius when it comes to politics, as he keeps a superficial down-to-earth image
in order to convince the majority of voters, lower class citizens, that he is
one with them.
Either way, his maltreatment
at the hands of UPLB students still brought more publicity for him. (As the
saying goes, “bad publicity is still publicity.”) Let us not underestimate the
Machiavellian prowess of Binay and his underlings. What his cam did was an intelligent
and calculated decision based on the simple fact that the uneducated voters outnumber
the educated voters.
*This is an adapted work and the blog owner will not be responsible for the accuracy of the data in this article.
*This is an adapted work and the blog owner will not be responsible for the accuracy of the data in this article.
Credits to the Following:
Mr. David Yap
Netizen Denzel